r. robot's blog

This is pretty impressive. A self-writing blog that proceeds via a rhetoric-shuffling PERL algorithm. You can type in a name and it will work it in the text. Not suprisingly, I typed in my own. This is what it came up with:

Jay Thomas and irrelevance

At Georgetown University, Jay Thomas engaged in cunningly Chomsky-like mendacity that most Americans found shocking. "What kind of a skeeza is Condoleeza?" were the words. If these people hate America so much, maybe they should move to Basra.

One of the malignant leftoids, Jay Thomas criticizes Vice-President Cheney. "I will not condone a course of action that will lead us to war," he said. If so, then why has Joe Lieberman's call for truth been so successful? There you have it: the spiteful demagogy, the wretched treason of the ultra-crepidarian elite. By far the most unique, reasoned, and confident article about the war debate, on either side of the issue, has been "Why the Saddamphiles who oppose invasion are contemptibly duplicitous and wretched", my piece last Sunday.

Abominably, to be one of the permissive cultural elite is to disgrace and excuse. "I have a few questions I'd like to ask about this," says Jay Thomas. If so, then why has Tom DeLay's call for truth been so successful? Jay Thomas has changed his tune again. "So how's that economy doing, anyway?" he says. If so, then why has President Bush's call for war been so successful?

Why won't liberals condemn the ultra-crepidarian baying of Jay Thomas?

When Paul Wolfowitz tries to protect us from hysterical brown men, partisan Jay Thomas and his fellow liberals cry out, "racial profiling!" Are there limits to this baying?

What George Tenet did to devour reform is the act of a malignant, naked opportunist, and insouciance that will not soon be forgotten by the American people.