the market
Great discussion over on Thicket about academia and the market. And no, I'm not an academic, so don't accuse me of liking his position because it directly benefits me. It doesn't.
For what it's worth, I posted the following shortly after launching this blog. It's a bit heavy-handed, but I still subscribe to basic position I tried to articulate. The idea is that some things should be protected, at least to some degree, from market forces, because the market -- as far as "cultural" commodities are concerned -- is basically just a cultural feedback loop and cannot, therefore, raise the level of cultural discourse.
free market feedback loop
Any instutition which serves to increase the level of education or cultural literacy of (i.e., "enlighten" for lack of a better word) a society should never be exposed to market forces. Implicit in the nature of enlightenment is that only those who are already at least a little bit enlightened will seek to further their own enlightment. And even the already-enlightened must sometimes be poked, prodded, provoked further down the path.
Consumerist market forces respond primarily to base needs, desires and drives. While niche markets for those seeking cultural enlightenment may emerge, the market as a whole will never secure enlightenment for society as a whole because society does not realize that it needs enlightenment.


1 Comments:
Jay,
I'm intrigued by this idea of the free market freedback loop, that it tends to support more basic kinds of need fulfillment and does not, by and large, address intellectual needs for enlightenment, what have you. I'm going to address this more extensively in part 3 of my serial post, which I hope to get up tonight. I think there's something to be said about the differences between an economy that's based almost entirely on ethical considerations and gift exchange in Lewis Hyde's sense and an economy based on acquisition of goods. Thanks for reading. I'll be back here soon.
Post a Comment
<< Home