a well-documented demonstration of vote hacking
This is a perfectly logical and detailed demonstration of how votes could easily, easily be hacked. Given everything I know (which is quite a lot, given that my job requires such knowledge) about Access databases and the ways in which software can interface with them, this makes total sense.
3 Comments:
again, the straw person fallacy. it is only well-documented insofar as that tiny example which is in no way indicative of how other systems are setup. not to mention, he makes assumptions about network access that are not necessarily givens.
i suspect there is nothing that would convince left-leaning people that Bush won the election legitimately. for those people the problem is moral and not factual.
Who spent $millions for 3rd-rate computer software (GEMS) to tabulate election results? The voting public has been betrayed twice: by the companies that created this crapware and by the state government officials who purchased it without appropriate review or evaluation. Will there be accountability for this betrayal? Remains to be seen, in light of pending litigation against both parties...
Many thanks for the comments, Doug. That's exactly what I wanted to say, only you said it better than I could have. :)
As for Anonymous, my claim in this post wasn't that this demonstration proves the vote was hacked, but rather that it shows how easily it could have been hacked. I do, in fact, believe that it was. But that wasn't my claim here. And it's unreal how you right wingers spin things. You know full well that W & Co. are the ones who don't care about facts. Yet you accuse me of not caring about facts, when the unreported facts of this election are precisely what I'm interested in uncovering.
Post a Comment
<< Home